Balanced News, Balanced Views

Budget Mess

Mark Bunker — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 05:43:00 GMT

We asked for your opinions on the state budget mess.

Unbalanced budget?It's too easy to blame an inept governor. Start by firing, recalling every democrat and some republican legislaters that got us into this fiscal mess.Californians, get over this entitlement bug fueled by borrow, borrow, borrow. Next, cut off all stae benefits to illegals. That will save 4-5 billion dollars more. -- John

This is a good thing. The Legislature is out of touch and it isn't until their pockets are completely empty that they then ask the question "what will we do?" It's not that they want to...it's that they now have no choice. Whatever it takes! --Vince

I feel the protestors are some of the very people to blame for the budget crisis. We have too many free-loaders, particularly illegal aliens, expecting taxpayer-funded entitlements from cradle-to-grave, as if there's an unlimited amount of money to take care of their needs. It's time for the legislators to look after the taxpayers to ensure our quality of life isn't eroded any more than it already has. -- Greg

Good for Arnold, he is finally acting like a Governor. The only hope this state has is to destory the unions, and stop paying for every so called need someone comes up with. Democrats can't give enough money away, but the keep trying. -- James

i think that they should come up with a budget that does not hurt the people of sandiego that are in need -- Arturo

The Governor is holding the state hostage. Why shouldn't oil companies pay their share? The cigarette tax makes sense as does the 15$ license fee proposed by the Legislature. I don't know how the multi-millionaire Governor can look in the mirror given the suffering that is befalling residents of this state. He wants the poor and middle class to pay the price for his rigid opposition to sensible taxes. -- Rachel

The answer is redistricting. Without a competitive election, we will never get our views represented in the budget. -- Matt

Mom Arrested

Mark Bunker — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:32:00 GMT

We asked about parents allowing underage drinking in their homes.

I think that parents should be held accountable for underage drinking. If the person is under the age of 21 it is slill illegal in the state of California. __ LIam

Does your production staff realize that your station condoned underage drinking? On last Saturday night's news broadcast, you showed Scott Roberts' father encouraging parents to "supervise" their children's underage drinking since "they are going to do it anyhow." It was irresponsible of you to broadcast his so-called "advice" and I'm embarrassed for you. I hope that an explanation is not necessary, but since you did show Mr. Roberts say what he did, perhaps you do need an explanation - what a shame. I'm sorry that Mr. Roberts lost his son so tragically and much too soon. However, the lesson here is NOT that Mr. Roberts needed to be present as his son consumed alcoholic beverages. The lesson here is that we must teach our kids to make smart and safe choices. Scott Roberts made the wrong choice and it cost him his life. Yes, I'm sure that Mr. Roberts would not have let his son binge drink had he been drinking at home, but the fact that he would have allowed his son drink at all is deplorable. May Scott Roberts rest in peace and I pray that the Roberts family find their own peace during this tough time, but please, stop encouraging underage drinking! -- RJ

I believe teen drinking will happen just about anywhere. I would rather have my child drink at home than drinking at some bonfire or parking lot where they can be charged for being drunk in public or get a DUI driving home. At least with the child home you can supervise and no one leaves and they can sleep it off. -- Mike

parents or young adults should not let under age kids drink at there house at all look what happens, and it does leave every one in a bad situation . and we lose our kids and our future...please dont let kids drink -- Jamie

i believ that if a parent is going to allow under age drinking inside their home they should be held accountable for what ever happens during that time, and in this case a student died, so the mother should be held acountable and charged with second degree murder -- Jose

Yes the parents are responsible! Alcohol kills people and should be illegal. Marijuana is a safe alternative. -- Darrell

I am currently under the legal drinking age and I feel it would be a lot safer to drink in my own home with my parents knowledge. I know if anything happened they would know how to react unlike other people my age. I do not feel it is right for parents to be charged for monitoring how much their children drink if they know that their child are going to drink. -- Danielle

Of course! What parent would want to jepordise their own childrens life, exposing them to drink alcohol. Legal age drinkers that do drink are not capable of much when they drink, imagine a teen. Its disgusting to know that there are parents that allow such thing -- Adam

The allowance of consumption of alcohol by a minor at your house is obviously not legal. However, as a 22-yr old male I can say that the kids will go out and drink. They will find a way to drink. Sometimes, as in my case, they have to drink away from home and can not end up staying the night at that house. I had a BAC of .362 the night I totaled my car. I almost killed 3 friends and myself. Was in the hospital for two weeks. I left the house because we were not allowed to stay there over night. Of course better decisions could have been made but the point is young kids will drink. We had a couple of parents who let us stay at their house and drink and took our keys. No one ever got in a wreck or got a dui or died from binge drinking at those houses. Some sort of plan or something shold beable to be thought out. It is a sad situation but it is inevitable. Alcohol incidents are only rising. The decision we have to make is can we help decrease the outcomes or continue to let things go as they are. -- Noah

Officer Goes Back to Work

Mark Bunker — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 05:15:00 GMT

What do you think about officer white returning back to work next week?

Officer Frank White has every right to return to work with the San Diego Police Department. He was acquitted of all criminal charges in a case that never should have been prosecuted by the D.A. I applaud his courage and congratulate him on his exoneration. He and his family deserve the very best. In a community where citizens have shot and killed their protectors, Officers Tony Zepetella and Dan Bessant, those who serve should have the right to protect themselves and their family members. The prosecution of Frank White was an outrage! -- Cynthia

Officer White should not be let back on the force so soon. The San Diego Police Department should have Officer White go through further training to make sure that he has cualifications to meet the Officer requirements. -- liam

It is unconscionable to think that this officer would be found not guilty for such an act done while as a CIVILIAN. Would any of us take the same actions we would face several felony charges, including attempted murder, yet this points to how there is clearly a double standard for police. Most worrisome is the fact that this happened in a context of increased instances of police brutality and violence across the country. This sets a VERY BAD PRECEDENT. This verdict is why an us & them mentality persists in our broken society by both sides!!!! -- Roberto

I don't think he should go back to work as a police officer. I would not trust him. I can not believe that he used his gun! You shoot to kill no other reason. He should not be allowed to be a police officer. thank God he does not work in my city!! -- Lita

hi i think its funny the way the cops wife says(he's ready 2 serve again) is he also ready to continue to shoot who ever and get away with it. what a way to abuse you're privlages thanks. -- Bobby

is all goverment no matter what he does in the street the goverment is gonna protect him thats why i hate that offiecers there allways will be protect bie the law unless they recorded that is when they take action i bet you if there was a video of the scene trust me he whone be in the streets or going back to work on monday trust me if anyone sees him in the street they wont trust him no more -- Jorge

I am very happy that Frank White was found not guilty and going to be back on the job to protect and serve. That lady was CRAZY and he was justified to protect himself and his wife. -- Donna

the officer should not get off so easy he should have some kind of punishment the boy could have been killed he is an officer trained to deal with this kind of problem the decision he made was wrong and he knows it. -- Jamie

I do not believe that the police officer should return to work. He pulled a gun on a woman who was aggressive toward him and his wife. If ordinary citizens pulled a gun on someone who has been aggressive toward them, theywould have been convicted of a crime. It is my assessment that the police officer used poor judgement in firing his gun. I believe that her vehicle was a weapon; however, she would not have damaged her car. The other concern is that he did not know that a child was in the car and he shot into the vehicle. The woman was punished for her crime, which she should have been, but the officer was not punished for using poor judgement. It will bother me if he returns to serve and protect with a gun. -- Angela

Under investigation means NO WORK until the investigation is complete. If i would have done what Officer White did i would be in prison for 20 years.. It must be nice to carry a badge and a gun... Nothing like a free pass. -- Ken

When Ms. Silva decided to drive drunk and use her car as a weapon, it became necessary for Officer White to defend himself and his wife. Ms. Silva was the agressor and suffered the consequences of the series of incredibly bad decisions that she made. -- Jim and Mary Jo

Officer White was tried and found not guilty by a jury. He should be allowed to return to work immediately. The sad thing in this whole story is the fact that a child life was but in jeopardy by a mother who was drunk, high and had a bad temper. -- Dave

The verdict was correct, not guilty for Frank White. Yet, he has demonstrated poor judgment while under stress. Is it shoot first ask questions later??? -- Thelma

I am extremely disappointed in our San Diego police department for not taking the time needed to evaluate the officer. Fact of the matter is, they were both in the wrong, and both excercised poor decision making. The mother should of thought of her son and walked away, and the officer should of excercise other options before pulling out his weapon. The SDPD chief letting his officer return to work this quickly. Is just showing the same poor judgement the officer showed that night. -- Lincoln

Silva should not have put her son in that situation. As a mother she is completely responsible for her own actions and the outcome for that matter. However I also feel that our police officers should be held to a higher standard and he could have avoided all of this by waiting for other police officers. Overall the one person a feel for is Silva's son. He is truly the victim in this case. -- Vanessa

Officer Frank White has every right to return to work with the San Diego Police Department. He was acquitted of all criminal charges in a court of law. I applaud his courage and congratulate him on his exoneration. In a commmunity where citizens kill their their protectors, Officers Tony Zepetella and Dan Bessant, these heros have every right to defend themselves and their family members. The prosecution of Frank White was an outrage. I wish him and his family the very best. -- Cynthia

I am glad for this, his job is to protect and serve. He was protecting. What if she would have been driving this way with someone else that could not protect themselves.Example an elderly, or a teen, person.She broke the law, and who knows what would of happened to her child if she did not run into the police officer. -- Tammy

I cant not believe that in the us a police officer would shoot inoffensive 8 year old boy and get away without charges and he's going back to work. Now not only do we have to worry about criminals but also our police officer's. -- Domingo

Why is it that parents feel Mr. White put this child & women in danger when in fact this boys mother evidently did not care about her sons safety by her own actions,alcohol abuse, drugs, screaming obcentities, ramming the police officers car. She should not get a dime out of this and the boy was saved by her actions and she should pay all financial costs that she is responsible for including the officers pay.Hopefully she will not have custody of this boy and only after severe rehabilatations in alcohol, and drug programs along with anger management classes should she spend time with her boy with supervised visitations until she can show she will not put him at harm again. what true parent could do this to their child. -- Gayle

Road Rage verdict

Mark Bunker — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:23:00 GMT

We asked you about the not guilty verdict in the Officer Frank White case.

It would have been stupid if the jury had found Frank White guilty. We pay for officers like him to get trained and protect us from people like Silva. Silva was threat to the public and her son while driving under influence and Officer White did what any one would have done, defend himself and others. If Silva had been acquitted, the general message to poeple like Silva would had been a very wrong one and would put the public even more at danger. -- Aldo

I can't believe officer Frank White was found not guilty. I think if he was on duty and wearing a uniform than his actions may have been justified but as an off duty copy in civilian clothing he would have been better off calling it in and staying keeping his distance instead of trying to be the hero and injuring a child. -- Mike

If i was a police officer and someone was driving there 3000lbs bullet at me, I would have shot also. The bottom line is that I am going home each day. I dont second guess what the officer did. If our justice system was more stern to people driving under the infulence of drugs or alcohol this problem would have nevere happened. She clearly was not in her right mide and should have never been driving. She caused all of the problems for this fine officer who protects us on a daily bases. -- Matta

I think it was great that the police officer was not guilty of the shooting, she was a hazard to anyone driving on the road and putting her child in jeopardy. Anyone who thinks that an automobile in the the hands of a drunk and drug addict isn't a lethal weapon is like an ostrich with their head in the sand. I would hope all SDPD officers are happy with the verdict. -- James

I believe that officer white abused his given privledge and is using the police department to cover his rear. he blatently shot at a women and her son, who was hit two times in the incedent. this is uncalled for and people need to do something. -- Jose

The biggest travesty is the fact that the district attorney decided to press charges on Mr. White. The assailant was drunk, high on meth, and engaged in road rage with her eight year old in the car. Yet he wants to go after the officer. Nice. Can we get rid of this guy? -- Vince

You showed the wife crying, traumatized by the event, but what about the child? Will he be able to have trust in policemen from now on? It is unfair that he got a not guilty verdict. It makes you think who can get away with doing certain things and who can't. -- Clare

I'm glad to see SD Police officer White was cleared. I hope he's able to get back to work, and know that there will be others who feel justice was not served. But, road rage is something that is becoming more common that we realize and it's had to predict what others might do. -- Greg

NOT GUILTY = That a cop once again can shoot anyone they want without worry. Even an 8 yr old child... Must be nice to never have to worry about getting in trouble because you carry a gun and a badge. -- Ken

In regard to Frank White's case, it is obviously a biased case based on this man's position. Where does one get away with shooting an unarmed person unless of course you're a cop. It's laughable that we criticize other governments about their corruption. When we cut loose cops that shoot unarmed women and children. -- Claudia

Bottle Bomb Prank

Mark Bunker — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:07:00 GMT

We asked your thoughts about the case of a Southbay teen facing felony charges for what he believes was a senior prank involving exploding bottles at a school.

I believe the judge is correct in his decision about the dry ice bombs. This kid is lucky nobody was hurt or worse killed due to his prank. Without the consequence of prison time, copycat pranksters just might kill or maim innocent people. The thought of mandatory prison time will make them think twice about such pranks. Dry ice bombs are one step away from terrorist activities. -- Robert

If someone was injuried as a result of this so called "prank" this would have a very different result. Parents would be highly up set, lawsuits pending, review of security measures, to name a few changes. This careless young man should be held accountable for his "criminal" actions and reimburse all police and fire response and investigation expenses. This is like a drunk driver involved in a car accident, but no one was killed. A drunk driver is still held responsable. -- Glenn

Its a tuff one, he did endangered students lifes. Luckly no one was hurt. I'm not a parent but he should be punished for what he did. I hope they go easy on him. But I doubt it -- Adam

It is ridiculous what things have come to. The city needs to focus on violent criminals instead of wasting their time on this kid. I cant even belive the DA is prosecuting. She needs to go. -- brad

The media should be ashamed for excessive hype in reporting about this incident. The term "Bottle Bomb", conjures images of explosives and terrorists in the mind's of many people; not once did I hear an explanation of the components of a bottle bomb. If Elphbert is guilty of possessing the materials to make an explosive device; then send the police to arrest me, too. I confess I have some dry ice and some 2-liter bottles of soda in the frig. -- Riki

Im a student of San Ysidro High School and i dont really think that the incident that happened in SYHS wasnt as big as the media makes it. It gives my school a bad reputation. And i dont think that the student that was charged for the bombs shouldnt be punished this bad. It was just a harmless prank. The media is just making the prank a huge deal. -- Oscar

This smells of grandstanding by the district attorney. Laforteza is a high school kid who made a dumb mistake. Sending him to jail for 6 years is ridiculous. If anything make him enlist in the military where his special skills can be useful. -- Brian

Clearly, this young man is remorseful over his actions, related to the prank. I do believe, the authorities are trying to make an example out of him. Thankfully, no one was injured. However, I am certain, he has learned his lesson. He appears to be an intelligent young man, and I believe he deserves a second chance. He has aspirations to obtain a college education, and be a productive member of our society. He is not a criminal, who deserves to spend 6 years in jail. The only crime he is guilty of is, an error in judgement. -- Eloisa

i would like to say that there should be some kind of punishment but not to the extent for prison or jail time that would ruin his future. some alternative would be better for the youth. seems he`s not the type to go down the wrong path in life. some kind of tuff program of some sort. -- jamie

I say make an example of him, no special treatment. If he was so smart, he would have thought before he acted. -- Lincoln

this kid needs to go to prison, this is a kid that could have killed your or my kids he needs to go to prison. this is not a prank this is somethhing terrorist do and it's not a joke to them. -- Michael

I think the teen should do time for his crime. Bringing bombs to school is just ridiculous. First school shootings then this. How is this supposed to be taken as a prank. Lock him up. -- Justin

Well my opinion on the kid looking at many felony counts, All I have to say is you do the crime, Do the time!! -- Henry

I think he needs to pay for his crime, just because he's inteligent and a good student, doesn't make what he did OK. He could have injured or killed somebody. Let him be the sacrificial lamb that, hopefully, will deter other children from doing this. -- Diana

Chula Vista Chargers?

Mark Bunker — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 05:26:00 GMT

We asked your thoughts on a new home for the chargers in Chula Vista.

Imagine this announcement one Monday night in the future: "Live from Chula Vista, California, it's Monday night football!" -- Steve

It would be a wonderful idea to put the stadium in chula vista because of a number of reasons.It would create pleanty of jobs, the interstate 5 and the trolley is already there. Not to mention that the power plant is so old and ugly. Finally, we just cant let the chargers go, espeacially to L.A. -- Daniel

I think it's a bad idea to move the Chargers To Chula Vista the Chargers Should remain The Sandiego Chargers I as a fan hope that they stay in their home Sandiego. -- Roman

Chula Vista needs to make this happen. McCann has shown great leadership in bringing this idea forward. Let's get this stadium done in Chula Vista and stop trying to push the Chargers out of town! -- Richard

A few people in our family have been season ticket holders for many years and if the chargers move to chula vista none of us will attend another chargers game live again. -- Michelle

Chula Vista is OK but how long is that going to take? I still say the best idea is to build a stadium at Vieja's and have the tribe buy the team. That way we can be rid of Spanos for good! -- Vince

Send the Chargers to L.A and send the Padres to TJ Mexico. Bring the the Yankees and the Cowboys to San Diego. -- Ray

Chula Vista should do whatever it takes to make the Chargers a reality. It would mean money and jobs, but best of all, itwould keep the Chargers from leaving the County! -- Jack

Cutting School Programs

Mark Bunker — Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:16:00 GMT

We asked about a plan to cut school programs to save money.

Stop bailouts for big shot failures save our schools. Children need a way to escape. I was one of those that needed music & dance to change my life. After working for the Kings County Juvenile Center I realized then without a way for kids to express themselves in school they turn to crime and violence. Make a change and change the government not our schools. -- Paul

What are the reasons for cutting programs in the arts or athletics? These programs are often life-lines for thousands of students at each high school in San Diego - as a current public high school graduate and current high school teacher, I am testament to that. Cutting these programs are not a budget fix, but are unfortunately an option for CA Education boards because of the simple fact that the programs do not support the CA Education Content Standards. Because of the framework for educational system the state has issued, districts are left with little choice. Should music or sports be cut? Never. Do our districts and board members have a choice? No. The fault lays in the hands of our governing system. It's easy to plea for arts and athletics in the schools. These programs invaluable. The spectators agree, but the rule-makers stand. While our students suffer, those in charge plan their next summer getaway. -- C.

This is really the end. We have money to educate illegal immigrants, medical care for illegals,money for overpaid retiring fire cheifs and police and city employees but no money for school sports or art. This is the end. Mayor Sanders should throw his support behind educating our kids rather than his lesbian daughter and his friends in the *** community. I think the Mayor just came out of the closet, why don't he make it offical and admit that he is a ***. -- James Jolly

It is not fair for the city to take away music classes to save money. Music is somthing that make's us come together. Taking away music would be incredebly devestating to teachers and for students. -- Liam

I hope the school board does not remove any extra curricular programs for these students. Sports, arts, etc are extremely important in student life and taking this away would be a shame. If these programs are taken away, schools would struggle more than they are now and an increase in test scores would drop as well! -- Rachel

I believe that some programs should be cut but not the ones that keeps us kids happy, not the ones that can make our futures brighter. -- Dawn

Children's Pool Seals

Mark Bunker — Thu, 28 May 2009 05:20:00 GMT

We asked you about the latest chapter in the seal saga.

I think removing the seals from the children's pool is the wrong decision. They are harmless and a huge attraction to the area. "All they need is one beach." -- Jennifer

As for the payments for removing the seals. I will do the job for 85,000 and spend everynight at the childrens pool so we can save the additional money and not have to pay the police. -- Ken

Why can't we live with the natural creatures in their environment. Don't we have enough of the beaches for our use? Or is it because it's LA JOLLA? -- Tony

It seems we could create a childrens pool (beach) somewhere else and leave the seals alone. I bet it would be easier than trying to chase the seals away and less expensive based on the cost figures at hand. -- David

Really? Is there a single sane person watching this broadcast that doesn't understand that this is all a political vehicle? And are we really willing to spend this much money to go against nature? The seals are obviously happy there, leave them the ---- alone. -- Matthew

We have seventy miles of sandy coastline in San Diego County. Isn't this enough space for the kids to go swimming? There is no tangible reason this one spot needs to be used by people any longer. -- Marquez

Why does everytime this city comes up with a solution to a problem it is stupid. And people wonder why we are broke. -- James

Are seals dangerous to children? In other words, can they "swim/ play" on the same beach area? -- John

I love the seals and think they bring alot of welcome tourist dollars to the area, much more than a children's pool ever could. That being said, if you want to pay me $94k a year I personally will go down to that beach and bark my head off. -- Tracy

Where do we apply for the seal technician position. $94,000 a year to carry barking dog equipment, hang out at the beach and paid police protection. Sounds like the opportunity of a lifetime. -- Melanie

How about an M16 and a full clip - $450. Why not use this on the seal problem in La Jolla? Much cheaper than $700K. -- Willy

I think that the issue of the seals in La Jolla is absurd. Parents take their children to see the seals in their natural habitat and not in inclosures at the zoo. In a way it is a trademark. The animals are beautiful, they are't hurting anyone or anything. It's ridiculous at the cost to remove them, when the economy is in no position to do so. -- Melissa

$94,000 to run a tape of dogs barking? No wonder the city is broke. After all we've been through the city thinks paying somebody $250.00 dollars a day is the way to go. It never stops our city leaders are out of touch with reality. Oh yeah, be sure and save water like the mayor tells you to! -- Vince

The seals should not be removed. There are enough beautiful beaches in La Jolla for families to enjoy without disrupting the colony of seals. Families with children enjoy watching the seals in a natural habitat. These same families/tourists contribute dollars to the local economy when in town. The recession is not the time to foolishly spend taxpayer dollars to the tune of 700 thousand dollars. -- Dolores

I say save a lot of money and get rid of them for the last time. if you run them off with dogs barking they will soon return. The best way is the way we used to do when they interfered with our fishing. Shoot them. Cures the problem. We have more seals then most people know. I know that there will be a lot of complaints. But the best way to do. They cant come back if they are dead. -- Richard

I cannot believe the city of San Diego is willing to spend so much money to destroy one of the best tourist attractions in San Diego. Wouldn't it be smarter to spend this money to prepare for the fire season by buying more fire tracks or a super scooper? -- Harel

I think the city has made the wrong choice in moving the seals from LaJolla. When I moved here it is one of the first things we went to see. Every time we have visitors we take them to see the seals. We really enjoy sitting and watching the seals in their natural habitat, it is much better then the aquariums. SAD SAD SAD -- Sandra

Prop 8 Ruling

Mark Bunker — Wed, 27 May 2009 05:54:00 GMT

We asked your thoughts on the court's ruling.

I'm not surprise w/court desicion, thats the way that shoud be for ever. Marriedge is between a man an a women. Amen. -- Domingo

Both sides were heard, however, the "Will of the People" or "Majority Rules" is and should be how controversies are decided. I think the Supreme Court was right in it's ruling along with the legality of the 18,000 couples that were married prior to the vote of the people. -- Chris

I'm suprised on the outcome of prop 8. I'm am very pleased with the courts decision, I feel if the gay community wants to voice their views on gay marriage, we that are against it should also be able to do the same. -- Christina

I am glad the court upheld the majority's vote. Gays sound like they think they should have the right to take away the rights of everyone else. It is sad the gays have such a narrow view of this, thinking only of themselves. Marriage has been between a man and a woman for thousands of years, it is one of the corner stones of society. I am glad to see the courts wisdom handed down today. -- Carl

I was not surprised by the CA Supreme Court decission however, I was disappointed. The court(s) are supposed to protect the minority from the oppressive majority as they did in Brown vs Board of Education and several other rulings. Clearly, The CA Supreme Court granted discrimination and the creation of second class citizens today. This is a sad day for CA and the CA constitution. -- David

I still feel strongly that gay marrige should not be passed... Marrige is between a man and woman. -- Jessica

This issue IS ABOUT LIBERTY AND HUMAN RIGHTS. The liberty and human rights OF FAMILIES to survive and thrive. Homosexual marriage licenses are a ringing public endorsement of sodomy. Sodomy is a crime in many states and rightly so due to its health consequences. The definition of sodomy being the placement of an organ designed to pro-create life into the organ designed to eliminate solid human waste. The medical community is very clear on sodomy… it is a healthcare disaster. -- Kevin

I am not surprised that the California Supreme court made this decision, but i am highly angered. While I'm not specifically trying to have gay marriage passed in California, i do believe that anyone and everyone has the right to have the feeling of love and happiness regardless of sexual orientation. -- Brad

Swine Flu

Mark Bunker — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:19:00 GMT

We asked what you thought about how the swine flu is being handled by the U.S. and Mexico, and by the media.

I think that the us is to quick to blame mexico for every thing. in this case it's the swine flu. -- Cruz

Today I was notified by an anonymous Customs Officer assigned to the San Diego Border that they are not allowed to wear masks protecting them from the swine flu. Their reasoning is they dont want to create panic. What is more important, public safety by preventing a disease to themselves and family or creating panic which the media has done already. The directive came from Customs and Border Protection headquarters. Could you investigate and possibly do a segment on this? I believe this is a violation of OSHA's safety guidelines. OSHA requires an employee to practice safety in the workplace by using gloves, eye and ear protection, helmets, etc... Some federal officers have families that include children and do not want to contaminate their young ones. So the question is this, what is more important; preventing public panic or safeguarding the health of federal american officers? -- F

I'm not surprised that people in Mexico don't want to take responsibility for this outbreak of the swine flu. All too often they refuse to take responsibility for anything that's wrong in their country. There's a reason for this, and you can be the judge. But, in my opinion Mexicans don't want anything negative opinions of them that would distance them from us. -- Greg

i think it has been going pretty well since i live in Tijuana we are all trying to keep safe wearing mask and stay indoors.The media say that it is stabilizing. I dont know about America there is only 5 cases -- Alez

I am a little scared about the swine flu because I ride the bus and trolley to a class I attend to Monday through Friday and I am wondering if I should start wearing a mask like other people are already. How do I know if I have it and I am not feeling sick yet? I heard some people died already. Should I be alarmed or what? I don't know what to think, it's driving me crazy! I'm only 35 and I would like to live at least to see 40! I tell you what though,I always wash my hands when I get home and before I leave home! -- Teresa

I think our government is not doing enough. This is a serious issue with the potential of becoming worst. Let alone there is no known cure. Are we just gonna wait till 150 Americans die, and 2,000 Americans are sick. It's a sad day when other countries like Russia, and China are more concerned for a virus that's an ocean away. Than us, a country that's right next door, and also has to face illegal immigration from Mexico. I think the media needs to do more in exposimg the faults in what our country is doing to stop the virus. Because who knows, next time it may not be the swine flu. Could be antrax, or the plague courtousy of al-quadda -- Lincoln

Responding to Mexico's skepticism on whether the swine flu started there isn't worth the effort. It's time to seal the border and stop all traffic coming in through our border crossings until this virus is contained and we're absolutely sure it's not going to inundate and affect our society any more than it already has. -- Greg

Plan B Pill

Mark Bunker — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:44:00 GMT

We asked what you think about allowing 17-year-olds get the "Morning After" pill.

If a woman can choose to engage in sex, she can choose whether or not to bear a child. At 17, a woman is no longer a child. -- Michelle

I feel that offering teens the morning after pill is a responsible thing to do as a country. Teens will continue to have sex no matter what we do. To save a child brought into the world by a child from having to raise their parent would be a gift to that teen. i also feel that birth control pills along with condoms should be offered free without the notification of parents would help prevent many unwated pregnancies and save younge women form having to consider abortion. Alot of kids cannot talk to their parents about their sex life and giving the option of being responsible for their actions could benefit everyperson in this country in many ways.Millions of women have used hormones for a long time with few side effects, offering birth control and the morning after pill for the recklas teen era could save a lot of woman from having broken dreams. -- Sara

Drinking two tinny pills vs. careing a fetus for 9 months? Plan B Emergency contraceptive pills are something that should be approved to be sold for all women not just seventeen year old and older. Today our Nation is increasing with teens that are having children at a very young age such 15 year olds so why not allow them to buy the pill without a doctors note? We are in the tweenty-firt century; therefore, we should be open about the desission that was taken. -- Wendy

It shouldn't require a prescription anyway. This is a good thing, it will dramatically decrease the amount of teenage pregnancies. Unless the parents want to be responsible for an unwanted child,it is the young woman's decision to take Plan B. -- James

I am 43 year old parent with a 21 year old son. I would hope that what he was taught would reflect in his judgement, perhaps I am living in a bubble though. If any child 16-18 is having sex, then we have not done our job as parents. I realize not every child takes to heart what we have to say, yet we as parents truly must be able to second guess our childs decisions and divert any opportunity for something of this nature to happen. Sex at any age is something no one should take lightly. -- Mitch

How about good ol' abstinence? I think the answer is teaching self-control and not giving minors a free pass to have premarital sex protected or unprotected. Planned Parenthood has done a great job of masking their undermining of parents as empowering as some great achievement. -- Reggie

I think as a parent the young adults should not be allowed to get the plan b at age 17 without the parents consent until the parent can talk to their young adult about their options. -- Helen

Allowing teens to obtain the plan "B" pill is the wrong answer. All this does is promote irresponsibility because they are being lead into thinking that a pill will fix there problems with no guarantees. What's next, teen abortions? -- Michael

Plan B should have been available to highschool kids a long time ago. Point blank- highschool kids are having sex and parents cant stop that. Those girls should have every option any other woman has. It is not an abortion pill. read a pamphlet, educate yourself. -- Summer

i believe that young girls should be allowed to used the day after pill for personal reasons,, but there should be a limit, i know girls my age, im 18 that take the pill everytime after sexual inntercourses, and they can posibly cause a illness -- Jessica

Giving birth control to 17 year olds??? Come on this is ridiculous what they need to give those teens is education; they might be able to prevent a pregnancy. But what happens to all the STDs they might contract there’s no pills for that. -- Angelica

Drivers License Checkpoint

Mark Bunker — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 05:29:00 GMT

We asked you about police checkpoints in Escondido.

I am a supporter of the checkpoints here in Escondido. I have had the unfortunate experience of being a victim of a hit and run, the person that fled was illegal with no license or insurance. I support our local police and thank them! Keep up the good work! -- Natasha

The Federal Government refuses to do their duty in stopping the flood of illegal immigrants. The police are using an unconstitutional method to help protect the citizens from illegals, a high percentage of whom commit crimes against citizens. The fact that they are here makes them a criminal anyway. It is OK with me, but they should only be stopping those people who look like they might be illegals. -- Ed

to the Escondido Police Department. If people have nothing to hide then they have nothing to fear. I hope they keep doing the work they are paid to do "PROTECT AND SERVE". -- John

I believe checkpoints do an extremely good job, but only on holiday weekends when there's partying and celebrating going on to put fear on drivers to not drive home drunk. But the random checkpoints when there's really no need for a checkpoint, specially in a city with a large Hispanic population does go under the 'harassment' category, targeting unlicensed Hispanic drivers. -- Eduardo

Driving without a license, registration and/or insurance is ILLEGAL, no matter what country you are from. Keep up the good work and keep the drunks and unlicensed off the roads! -- Shelly

I think the police are doing an absolutely amazing job with their drivers license check points and I feel there should be more of them. If you are decent citizen and have a valid drivers license what is there to complain about? For those complaining that the check points are truly meant to find illegal immigrants perhaps you should review that last statement. "ILLEGAL" immigrants, hmmm, last time I checked the police are here to enforce the law and being "ILLEGAL" is against that law is it not? -- Tyler

In light of the recent car chase where the life of Douglas Tarry was lost, I've always supported license and insurance checkpoints for the purpose of getting unlicensed, uninsured, intoxicated, and illegal drivers off our roads. This isn't rocket-science and illegal aliens are oftentimes guilty of one or more of these offenses and are likely to hit-and-run if involved in an accident. Illegal alien advocates continue to play the race and their arguments against checkpoints do not have any merit. As a law-abiding citizen who doesn't drive intoxicated, without a license, uninsured, or illegally I've had enough of those who do and put the rest of us in danger. -- Greg

I pay taxes. Illegal immigrants don't. These check points are examples of my tax dollars in use. These check points not only find drivers without a license, they also find wanted fellons, drunk drivers and other criminals. Should we find this practice unfair for everyone who is arrested or cited for violations not related to the check point's original intent? -- Ryan

The Escondido's police dept is doing the right thing due a VERY HIGH volume of people drive with out supend or no driver license, mainly others from different counties they see that is does not matter if they get a ticket due the move back and i know this for fact due work for a private agency that do collection for the court and the tell you oh well they are nothing paying. ENGOUGH IS ENOUGH is not a race issue neither -- Eve

I think that it is a great thing that there having drivers checked to see if they have the proper things to be on our streets they need to have every city doing that maybe everyone can sleep better at night knowing that it is a privalage to drive in the state of Califorina. Some people are upset because the truth does that to everyoone you have to be legal to live here go back to your own country maybe some of us can have our jobs back -- Audrey

On the drivers license checkpoints I used to think it was not a good idea until I got a job driving women to clean homes who did not have a license & therefore no ins. but drove to work and around anyway. They knew the risk involved and took it anyway and said they would hope to drive away should they be involved in an accident. This scares me for me & my family. -- Raymond

Good for Escondido. Keep up the good work at making it safe for your population. Every driver should be licensed and have insurance and if they have that there is "no" need to worry. We as citizens have to pay more insurance because of the number of uninsured drivers. "It ain't right." -- Annetta

If it's just a checkpoint, why are they calling the Boarder Patrol? They shouldn't be looking for immigrants, it's drivers under the influence who they should be looking for.It just doesn't make sense to send for the Boarder Patrol; it's racist. -- Kelly

I guess I just don't understand. Some people believe that police in Escondido are infringing on the rights of persons to not only drive illegally without a license, but to live illegally in the U.S as well? It sounds like a desperate argument to protect those who are breaking the law. -- Andrew

only in the USA people are worried about upsetting illegal immigrants . What don't Americans understand about the word " Illegal ? " . Certainly normal law abidding citizens won't be worried about a simple license check.Stop giving them rights , they choose to enter this coutry illegally...again i'm certain that word in the same definition in ANY country !!!!!!!!! -- Robin

check points for drivers licenses is just one more risk the illegals face. should do it 7/24. -- David

COPS should be out on patrol helping crime. Let boarder Patrol handle the Imigration problem. -- Iris

I think the police officers are merely trying to do their job and to some people, there always has to be an alternative reason when there is not. I do not think there is harassment issues, however if illegal immigrants are stopped, then it is the law that they too should have their vehicle impounded right? They go and hit someone, then they have no insurance to cover it. Illegal is illegal to me -- Samantha

It is really not logical to think that police checkpoints are directed at illegal immigrants or any particular race. Everybody on the road is subject to the same scrutiny and rules. I don't care if you are from Norway! You have to have a lic. ins. and be sober to drive. Don't break rules then you have nothing fear! -- William

Escondido Police have every right to enforce the law at checkpoints. Where in the world can I go and expect to drive without a license? Besides, they have been effective at curtailing crime. This should be continued because it works! -- Charlie

I commend Chief Maher for the job he is doing & hopefully they will keep him status quo. Since when are we allowed to drive sand license DUH ! ! ! Hit & runs are rampant in these illegal communities as they do not have to comply with our laws. OMG Don't get rid of a man who is doing his job in our justice system. I say... return our country to the "old days" when everyone had to comply & our beautiful state wasn't "broke" -- Ellie

Miss California Question

Mark Bunker — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:27:00 GMT

We asked what you think about Miss California's comments during the Miss USA Pageant.

I Do not feel as though there was anything wrong with her response. She was asked a question and she answered it honestly, and according to what she believe. Her response should have been accepted without prejudice. We cannot not expect someone to answer a question according to our belief. -- John

What the California beauty contestant said was her opinion and the opinion of the majority of Californians (twice voted). Why T.V. stations try to endorse the homosexual life style and not a regular family is beyond me or the majority of the state. I guess it's time to wake up T.V. and report both sides of the story before people stop watching you like they have stopped reading the one sided news papers. -- James

I think it one sided of the people to allow the judge of a national event to express his anger as he did Not Professional at all. Our world has this same sex marriage junk shoved down our throats, that is a life-style not an ethnicity you are not born Gay. -- Mark

It is disappointing to hear that judges are stating that Miss California lost her right to the Miss USA title simply because she honestly expressed her views on same-sex marriage. What is becoming of our nation when you are blasted for staying true to who you are? The question was asked because it was controversial - it tested the contestant to see if she would stay true to her heart, even when her answer didn't agree with the judges views. If Miss California truly lost because she expressed her beliefs then the Miss USA pageant has lost its validity as a legitimate pageant. How sad. -- Heidi

Personally it's completly unfair what they are saying about Miss California. Perez asked a question, she answered the question from her heart and her opinion and upbringing, because she not feel the same way that Perez fills on the situation, or all other gay couples she is getting critizied. Thats unexceptable what happen to freedom of Speech, dont we live in America? I thought the answer she gave was great, she was not trying to upset anyone, and she stated that. That is how she was brought up. So Perez you are a Gay man Of course you are going to have your own opinion on gay marriage, and most the people upset by what she said were the gay community. -- Cassandra

The judge who asked the question was the one who started the "controversy" regarding gay marriage etc. In response, she was ABSOLUTELY WITHIN HER RIGHTS to voice her opinion. Lets face it, this gay rights stuff is getting out of our control. -- Julie

Perez Hilton is a joke. Just because someone doesn't share his opinion he slam Miss California. Miss California was very respectful and just shared HER opinion. That is the problem with the Pro gay marriage side, they just can't see that their is TWO sides to this debate. In California we voted twice now, the marjority does not want gay marriage in California, moved to another state if you want to marry the same sex. -- Rich

The judge at the Miss America contest obviously had a calculated question that was politicaly motivated, intolerant and had nothing to do with the spirit of the contest. No matter what the question, the contestants had every right to answer their opinion without any repercussions. -- Jeff

I applaud her sincere answer. She had no control of the question, but when asked, she spoke her views. Don't we live in a country that has a freedom of speech? The only hate speech that I heard was from Perez Hilton on his website,just because her answer was not what he expected. By the way , her answer is the majority of California Voters as well. -- Miguel

I applaud Miss California for answering the question based on her beliefs. I don’t believe this kind question should NOT have ever been asked in the first place and it definitely should NOT have been used against her in determining whether she wins or not. -- Guy

The question posed to Miss California was undeniably unfair, and someone would be offended no matter how she answered. In my opinion, the question was totally inappropriate. First, young girls watch Miss USA pageants, and I don't believe it is a subject that should be posed in such a forum. It was being used as a means by which to push an agenda, and this was not the time or place. Second, it is an extremely controversial topic that has people divided, and it functioned as a trap. If you watch carefully, Perez Hilton shakes his head in disapproval and then begins to write his scores. I believe he was the one who was biased. No matter what anyone's personal beliefs, one of the qualities that Miss USA should possess is integrity. I believe she exhibited poise and integrity in the face of sure opposition; thus, she embodied the essence of Miss USA. Go against your beliefs and forfeit integrity or express yourself honestly...What would you do? -- Diane

I don't believe this is an appropriate question for a pagent, however, I believe one should not be afraid to stand up for what they believe, isn't that freedom of speech and America? What about the hateful things Perez Hilton said about her on his blog after the pagent? Shouldn't tolerance go both ways? The freedom to disagree! -- Laurelyn

This country is turning in to a bunch of whiners. Whether I agree with her opinion or not, it is just that, "her opinion". What next? If you have an opinion you will be stoned by some opposing person or group for expressing it. Sounds third world to me. COME ON! Aren't we better than this. -- Eddie

the same sex question was loaded for good effect. the individual asking the question was on his script from the gay community. inappropriate subject for this venue. do i hear the word ambush! -- David

I applaud Kristen for being honest and speaking her mind, in a nice manner. She was raised with these values. No one should be offended with her beliefs. There has been alot of whining ever since proposition 8 failed. It failed - lets move on and try again another day. Additionally, Our politicians can learn from Kristens straightforward honesty. -- Nicolas

The question was inappropriate for the forum...Having said that, The answer was SPOT ON!! -- Richard

I feel that she was very right in her answering the question she was ask. The only thing bad about it was they ask her opinion and then didn't like her answer and held it against her. Just because she was trustful in her beliefs. -- Teresa

I'm not sure if her comments are the reason Miss California lost to Miss North Carolina, but if that is the reason I find it very uplifting. I myself am not homosexual but I have many close friends whom are and I believe love is love,and should be celebrated. There's far too little of it in the world and to deny two people the right to express their love for each other is wrong. Some people have said she has her right to her opinion, but they forget Miss America is a figure head in the public view and her opinion is considered to be a voice speaking for others. That voice should ring out with understanding and respect for all, encouraging hope and unity, not be based on outdated religious views which hurt others. -- Shelley

If she would have answered in support of same-sex marriage, she would be hearing it from the other side. It is a lose-lose situation for her. The question shouldn't have been asked, it is not important to know how a beauty contestant feels on such a sensitive matter. -- Alex

As of today, we still have freedom of speech. It seems like a few people would like to take that away from us if we don't agree with them. I am glad some are willing to say what they believe. I hope we will never loose that right. -- Virginia

I think it's totally hypocritical for the contest organizers to ask her a loaded question. She has her own opinion and it isn't a wrong or right answer. It's actually how most people feel (Prop 8) but they just won't publicly announce their belief's for fear of being ridiculed. She has the right to believe as she does even if it's not what certain people want to hear. -- Dave

I salute Carrie a having the courage to stand for her belief. She could have said otherwise and win the title, but she put faith first before anything else. To us,, you are already a winner. Kudos to you!!!! -- Gay

Way to go Miss California!!! She has every right to give her opinion of a "loaded" question. This country was founded on Biblical principles..God did not design marriage to NOT be between a man and woman. Proud of MISS CALI -- Sherrie

Carrie did the right thing. She was asked to give her OWN OPINION and she did so with poise and respect. It is sad that she lost the pageant because she was honest and showed integrity. Her morality and honesty should be commended and Perez Hilton should be chastised for knowing what her response would be and trapping her in an un-winnable question. Shame on him! For those that think Carrie seems bigoted please recognize that this is America, she is entitled to her opinion, and that same sex marriage was voted against (Prop 8) by Californians recently. Carries was just expressing the opinion of the majority of her state. -- Michael

I thought Miss USA's comments stating that marriage should be between a man and a woman were just fine. She was asked her opinion and gave it, and there is no reason why she should be criticized for that. If she had not been asked that specific question, she most likely would not have brought the subject up. -- Ted

I think she had all the rights to answer the way that she did. At least we do atill live in America. And I have been taught that we have the right to say what we want. As long as it dont hurt others. Called our rights in the good old U.S.of A -- Richard

I think if you're going to ask a question on such a sensitive subject, be prepared to hear the answer, whether it's same sex marriage, abortion, etc. It may not be what you want to hear, but I'm sure that wasn't the question she wanted to answer. I commend the contestant for not being afraid to state her opinion. -- Emily

On the comments or opinion of Miss California USA Carrie Prejean regarding same sex marriages, she made NO controversial statement as San Diego 6 has stated prior to airing the piece, rather she spoke her opinion and was shutdown for it by the militant gay's. She's still a winner in my eyes and others that prefer the truth. -- Tony

I fully support Carrie. Her answer was forthright and non controversial. She wasn't putting forward an agenda like the Gay Rights supporters, it was simply an honest opinion. Way to go Carrie keep your poise and your position. And you're beautiful. -- Robert

I believe that people should be able to choose who they spend their lives with, whether that is with someone of the same sex or opposite, however, Perez Hilton asked Miss California a question and she answered as honestly as possible. Isn't that what the question part of the competition is about. People need to stop making such a big deal out of this. -- Joe

Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, although i dont agree with Miss Californias message, it is her opinion, and that is exactly what perez hilton asked her, for an opinion, not his answer. -- Aja

Good for Ms. California. Now if only the wippy city leaders spoke the truth maybe we could put an end to this disguting nonsense that gays have a right to marriage. -- James

It is sad that in society we vilify people for their opinion. It is sad that the liberals have such a strong hold on society that if you voice your opinion and it does not mix with theirs then you are a bad person. I support Ms. California and her courage to stick to her values, knowing that she would be beat down by the liberals and the national media. -- Darren

Well first of all same sex marriage should be treated as equality and be allowed in any state. But overall her opinion is her own and she can decided what she wants. People should not judge her on her decision everyone has different believes. Plus that was a hard question to answer especially on stage and in front of such large audience and media. -- Daniel

no offence marriage is between man and woman god made adam and eve not adam and steve -- Robbie

I'm proud of Carrie Prejean and what she had to say regarding same sex marriage. Coming from a state where this issue is so highly debated and having the confidence to stand by her decision no matter whether she won or not, says a lot about her character. Good for you Carrie! -- Tyler

I think it is sad they asked for her opinion and now they are condemning her for giving her opinion. -- Carol

I feel Ms. California was very brave in her statement. I also believe she could have answered the question differently as posed in Perez Hilton's video but who truly wants a role model who sits on the fence when it comes to important issues of today? -- Michael

I believe that Miss. California does have the right to state her opinion, but I believe that it was wrong to put every christian in the same category about same sex marriage. Not everyone shares the same views. That would be impossible. Thank you. -- Kathryn

I think Miss California has the right to her own views, but I think the way she answered the question was inappropriate because the Miss USA name is meant to unite and by answering in that way, all she did was push people away from her. -- Hayley

Do we not honor freedom of speech. How is it that when someone expresses a view relating to their "religeous beliefs" that comes into question? She in my opinion did right and i concur with her views. -- William

Miss California stated her beliefs about marriage - one man and one woman - bravely, and honestly. I admire her and may God continue to bless her with His strength. She should not be critized for her beliefs. -- Therea

Don't come down on Miss California because her answer to the question wasn't what some people wanted to hear. She is entitled to her opinion. Maybe the question wasn't an appropriate question to ask at an event like this. Perez Hilton should not have asked the question if he wasn't ready to hear the answer. Never ask a question if you don't know what the answer will be. it should not have cost her the crown. -- Pamela

I am proud of Miss California's response. The judge was shamful for his horrible reaction after her answer. What a horrid judge. -- Sherie

Predator Release

Mark Bunker — Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:21:00 GMT

We asked your thoughts on the plan to release sexual predator Matthew Hedge from custody.

I dont understand how these judges can just keep letting these sex offenders out. what is wrong with them? they are just going to keep hurting people. And they should relieze they are putting our children and women at risk. I say if they are going to let these horrible people out that they need their own community where they cant hurt anyone. -- Raeann

Obviously this situation is going to repeat itself, what family or community is going to want a sexual predator near it's childen? A decision needs to be made what we as a society are going to do with these people...if these prole are deemed uncurable and we do not want to have them released into society then we should drop the fiction/facade of them being eligible for parole or release from prison after serving their "debt to society" and just do what society wants and give them a life sentence. -- Brian

We should put him in that nice, brand new condominium across from Downtown police headquarters, or better yet, put him right next to the mayor's house. Stop dumping trash in the South Bay. -- Juno

Padres Opener

Mark Bunker — Tue, 07 Apr 2009 05:19:00 GMT

We asked your opinion on the Padres chances this season.

Despite our failures in the past, I am convinced our invincibility in sport will continue, the team itself will provide enertainment and hope for local faithful san diegians. -- David

The opening day will ensure my intent to be seated and enjoy the home team, our fellow padres, my faith in an consistent ability to produce winnings will be confirmed as I communicate with the nearby fans dressed in decorative uniform, enjoying beverages and an hot dog which is solely complimentary to the excitement confirmed to climax. -- Paul

Get used to the losses padres fans, the padres might have one of the worst offenses in all of baseball. Also if this is how the padres do with Peavy pitching...well let's just say 95 plus losses is not out of the question. -- Brian

Considering all the practice the San Diego Padres have gone through, I believe that this season they will prove to be unstoppable. -- Rafiq

The ball park is wonderful, but the Padres chances are slim and none of winning anything but the number 1 pick in the next draft. -- James

i think today was pretty fun we all enjoyed our friar team and the sprit of San Diego i think we do have a great chance but were gonna start off slow this season but work our way up to the top.Jake peavy got to take us.WHOO GO PADRES -- Seth